![]() Level 3, 4, and 5 headings are indented, followed by a period, and run in with the text that follows.Again, the number of subsections you will need will depend on your topic and writing style. For subsections, we recommend that if you are going to have them at all, you should aim for at least two (e.g., the Literature Overview section has no subsections, whereas the Method section has two Level 2 subsections, and one of those Level 2 sections is further divided into three sections, etc.).Subsequent headings of equal importance to the first heading also go at Level 1 (here, Method, Results, and Discussion).Your writing style and subject matter will determine what your first heading will be. In this paper, the first heading is “Literature Overview,” so it goes at Level 1. However, in APA Style, the heading “Introduction” is not used, because what comes at the beginning of the paper is assumed to be the introduction. Every paper begins with an introduction.See this post for a clarification on when to use boldface. Only the headings at Levels 1–4 use bold. The title of the paper is not in bold.Important notes on formatting your headings: In the future, we hope that researchers will consider multiple sources of information when making assessments of anxiety. Some of the strengths of our research were. The results for rejection sensitivity paralleled those for anxiety, demonstrating that. For trait anxiety, other-report data indicated that friends of participants were significantly more likely. For trait anxiety, participant self-report data indicated that participants were significantly less likely. For state anxiety, other-report data indicated that friends of participants were significantly more likely. For state anxiety, participant self-report data indicated that participants were significantly less likely. We adapted the RSQ so that questions referred to the target participant rather than the self. We adapted the STAI–A so that questions referred to the target participant rather than the self. We also included other-report measures to obtain independent sources of information about participants’ levels of anxiety and rejection sensitivity. ![]() Participants took the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ Downey & Feldman, 1996), an 18-item self-report measure that assesses rejection sensitivity. Participants took the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI–A Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, & Jacobs, 1983), a 40-item self-report measure to assess anxiety. ![]() We first administered several self-report measures, as follows. Participants were instructed to bring a friend with them who would complete the other-report measures. All participants attended a follow-up session to complete assessments. Eighteen percent of the sample met the criteria for generalized anxiety disorder according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders (First, Gibbon, Spitzer, & Williams, 1996). During the initial interview session, doctoral level psychology students assessed participants for psychiatric diagnoses. To reduce bias in the sample, we described the study as a “personality study” rather than specifically mentioning our target traits of anxiety and rejection sensitivity. We placed flyers about the study on bulletin boards around campus, and the study was included on the list of open studies on the Psychology Department website. They received course credit for their participation. Approximately 70% of participants were European American, 15% were African American, 9% were Hispanic American, and 6% were Asian American. Participants were 80 university students (35 men, 45 women) whose mean age was 20.25 years ( SD = 1.68). For example, Ronen and Baldwin (2010) demonstrated. In particular, we examined how participant self-ratings of state and trait anxiety and rejection sensitivity would differ from the ratings of others, namely, the close friends of participants.Īnxiety and rejection sensitivity are two important facets of psychological functioning that have received much attention in the literature. Our study investigated anxiety and rejection sensitivity. Anxiety Made Visible: Multiple Reports of Anxiety and Rejection Sensitivity We have previously explained in detail how to format each level of heading. The example below shows font and indentation formatting for when all five levels are used, including what to do when headings follow one another with no text in between. 62–63 see also the sample papers) gives guidelines for up to five levels of heading in a paper, although most papers will need only two, three, or four. The APA Publication Manual (section 3.03, pp. They not only tell the reader what content to expect but also speak to its relative position within a hierarchy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |